In India, every buyer currently demands an IP rating on their smartphone. However, Realme provides no information about IP ratings in Realme C53. Some sources leak that it has an IP rating, but the company doesn’t expose it. We have decided to arrange a water test for this device because there is no positive official statement on IP rating. So, the obvious answer is that Realme C53 is not waterproof.
Realme C53 Waterproof Tests
In our test, the smartphone has to go through different conditions, such as:
- 30 Seconds dipped in Water or accidental splashes.
- 5 Minutes dipped in Water.
- 10 Minutes dipped in Water.
The waterproof test results are purely based on individual/team observation. These tests will only give an idea of whether a device is waterproof. We recommend users not try this test at home, as it might damage their device.
Let’s begin with our waterproof test on the latest Realme C53.
30 Seconds Dipped in Water
| Touch screen/ Display |
Working |
| Speakers |
Working after draining the water |
| Microphone |
Not Working |
| Camera |
Working |
| Fingerprint Scanner |
Responsive |
| 3.5mm Jack |
No headphone jack |
| Charging Port |
Working |
| Power and Volume Key |
Working |
5 Minutes Dipped into Water
| Touch Screen/ Display |
Working |
| Speakers |
Not Working |
| Microphone |
Not Working |
| Camera |
Working |
| Fingerprint Scanner |
No Problem Yet |
| Power and Volume Key |
Working |
10 Minutes Dipped into Water
| Touch Screen/ Display |
Not Working |
| Camera |
Not Working |
| Fingerprint Scanner |
Not Working |
| Power and Volume Key |
Not Working |
Conclusion
We reached the final crucial outlook after thoroughly testing the Realme C53. As a result, shows the device is splashproof and somewhat withstands dustproof. So if you do not care about IP rating, you should use this smartphone. However, I must warn users that the device is not waterproof or splashproof. The device has no official IP67 or IP68 ratings, which strongly suggests that it is not waterproof. Furthermore, our tests failed because the device had no active water-resistant coating or other protective gear against liquid.